Cases 11 - 20 of 605
Henry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Adam Henry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Chaidez et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Matthew Chaidez, Stephanie Perez, Matthew Chaidez and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Krouse et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mills Krouse, Paige E. Krouse and Daniel Mills Krouse 1989 Trust UAD December 26, 1989
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Randle v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Payne T Randle
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brazier v. USA
as 3:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Kevin L Brazier
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas v. USA
as 3:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
Cory Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Letner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
Joshua R Letner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hartleroad v. USA
as 1:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Kevin Hartleroad
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Casillas v. USA
as 2:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Roger Casillas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jaquez v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Luis H Jaquez
Defendant:
United States of America
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
