Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00477
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kaluf et al v. Moreno Garcia
as 2:2012cv00419
Plaintiff: Natalie D Kaluf and Randall N Kaluf
Defendant: Sandra Moreno Garcia
Intervenor: American National Property and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Type: Contract Insurance
Custy v. BP Products North America Inc
as 2:2012cv00339
Plaintiff: Natalie N Custy
Defendant: BP Products North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huck v. Target Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00249
Plaintiff: Natalie M Huck
Defendant: Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
1st Source Bank v. A-1 Pipe Cleaning Services Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00243
Plaintiff: 1st Source Bank
Defendant: A-1 Pipe Cleaning Services Inc, James D Murray and Natalie S Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metz v. ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company
as 3:2011cv00300
Estate_plaintiff: Natalie Metz
Defendant: ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company
Counter_claimant: ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company
Counter_defendant: Natalie Metz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Rardin v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00019
Plaintiff: Natalie Rardin
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Turk v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00303
Plaintiff: Natalie Marie Turk
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?