Cases 11 - 20 of 171
WALL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv01042
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALL
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WATKINS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv01021
Plaintiff:
CAROL A. WATKINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HALL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00783
Plaintiff:
CARLA M. HALL
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SELBURG v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00794
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL W. SELBURG
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2009cv00764
Plaintiff:
JOYCE PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FERRILL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00727
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. FERRILL
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
POINDEXTER BROADNAX v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00719
Plaintiff:
RHONDA E. POINDEXTER BROADNAX
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LI MARZI v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00715
Plaintiff:
TERRY M. LI MARZI
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CONAWAY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00635
Plaintiff:
DONNA CONAWAY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SMITH v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00608
Plaintiff:
NELLIE R. SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
