Cases 21 - 30 of 205
SHORT et al v. J.A. CONRAD'S CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC
as 1:2009cv00241
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. SHORT and LABORERS WELFARE, PENSION AND TRAINING FUNDS
Defendant:
J.A. CONRAD'S CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHORT et al v. MARTIN AND SONS INCORPORATED
as 1:2009cv00242
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. SHORT and LABORERS WELFARE, PENSION AND TRAINING FUNDS
Defendant:
MARTIN AND SONS INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BARTON et al v. GILMER TRUCKING, LLC
as 1:2009cv00243
Plaintiff:
DANNY BARTON and INDIANA TEAMSTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND
Defendant:
GILMER TRUCKING, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROBERT D. LOOSE FUNERAL HOME, INC. v. JOSEPH B. FARIS, CLU
as 1:2009cv00166
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. LOOSE FUNERAL HOME, INC.
Defendant:
JOSEPH B. FARIS, CLU
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HUNTER et al v. AMERICAN ART MOSAIC & TILE CO INC
as 1:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
STEVE HUNTER and BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTSMEN HEALTH & WELFARE FUND -- TERRE HAUTE
Defendant:
AMERICAN ART MOSAIC & TILE CO INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LAUER et al v. MARBURGER FLOORING, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
MIKE LAUER, MIKE LAUER, STEVE YEAGER and others
Defendant:
MARBURGER FLOORING, INC. and KIMBERLY K. MARBURGER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCLESKEY et al v. DOUG & STEVE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 1:2008cv01728
Plaintiff:
MARK MCCLESKEY and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
DOUG & STEVE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. ATA HOLDINGS CORP. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
as 1:2008cv01607
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL O. SMITH
Defendant:
ATA HOLDINGS CORP. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
