Cases 1 - 10 of 67
PARRISH v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02567
Plaintiff:
KELLY M. PARRISH
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FAIRER v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv01399
Plaintiff:
KENNETH FAIRER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs
BROUGH v. SAUL
as 4:2019cv00150
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
BRIAN D BROUGH and BRIAN D. BROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
MILLER v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01323
Defendant:
NANCY BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
DANA D. MILLER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HAINER v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01243
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
ANA M. HAINER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NUNEMAKER v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00479
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA L NUNEMAKER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
WHEELER v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01729
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
KAREN E. WHEELER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WHITE v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01223
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
GENE WHITE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
NELSON v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00683
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
GARLAND NELSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LAMBERT v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00023
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
FRANK A. LAMBERT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
