Cases 11 - 20 of 413
WICKLINE v. D. H. PACE COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
SHARLENE WICKLINE
Defendant:
D. H. PACE COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
WILLIAMS v. DOLGENCORP, LLC
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
TONIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WESNER v. CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC. et al
as 4:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN WESNER
Defendant:
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC. and MCCAIN FOODS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
OKERSON v. KOHL'S, INC.
as 1:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Theresa O. Okerson
Defendant:
KOHL'S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HUMPHREY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 4:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HUMPHREY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BAKER et al v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I et al
as 1:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
PATRICK A BAKER, MIKKA BAKER and PATRICK BAKER
Defendant:
KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I doing business as PAY LESS SUPERMARKET, W.E. KELLUM, INC. and KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I d/b/a PAY LESS SUPERMARKET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WHITE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
PAMELA WHITE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ENGLEKING v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE ENGLEKING
Defendant:
KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLIDAY v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv03090
Plaintiff:
SAUNDRA HOLIDAY
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ASH v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv03045
Plaintiff:
CAROLEE ASH
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
