Cases 11 - 20 of 37
LEIFSON et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01996
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BRENDA LEE LEIFSON and LEE GEORGE LEIFSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MAFFEI v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01992
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
NORA MARIE MAFFEI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HARMON v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01983
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
WANDA B. HARMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CLARKSTON v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
as 1:2015cv01492
Plaintiff:
JOYCE K. CLARKSTON
Defendant:
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCAIN v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
as 1:2015cv01390
Plaintiff:
SUSAN MCCAIN
Defendant:
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KORBLY v. WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
as 1:2015cv00762
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. KORBLY
Defendant:
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH ET AL. v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC
as 1:2015cv00706
Plaintiff:
LINDA ROPER SMITH and STEPHEN SMITH
Defendant:
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GUINN v. EXACTECH U.S., INC.
as 1:2015cv00656
Defendant:
EXACTECH U.S., INC.
Plaintiff:
SHARA GUINN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
DECRANE et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
DENISE GAY DECRANE and CHRISTOPHER HAGAN HUFF
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BOLES ET AL. V. ELI LILLY AND CO.
as 1:2015cv00351
Plaintiff:
NATASHA LYNETTE BOLES, MARIO JOHN COWELL, MARY RUTH COWELL and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
