Cases 21 - 30 of 122
CURTIS v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 1:2015cv01566
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA CURTIS
Defendant:
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MATTESON et al v. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01493
Plaintiff:
JASON BARRIOS, TERESA BAUDOUR, FELICIA BONSER and others
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
SBA TOWERS V, LLC et al v. CITY OF MADISON BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
as 1:2015cv01467
Defendant:
CITY OF MADISON BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Plaintiff:
SBA TOWERS V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooks et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01409
Plaintiff:
PAULA BROOKS and VIOLET V. BROOKS
Defendant:
MANLEY DEAS KOCHALSKI, LLC and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TURNER v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
as 1:2015cv01363
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LUTIN v. JAVITCH BLOCK LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01342
Defendant:
JAVITCH BLOCK LLC and TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LUTIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DICK V. RGS FINANCIAL INC.
as 1:2015cv01127
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DICK
Defendant:
RGS FINANCIAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
REDMAN v. SMITH & COHEN, et al.
as 1:2015cv00858
Defendant:
BRIGHTWATER CAPITAL, LLC and SMITH & COHEN, LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID REDMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HOLT v. LVNV FUNDING, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00851
Defendant:
FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. and LVNV FUNDING, LLC
Plaintiff:
LISA HOLT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MITCHELL v. CACH, LLC
as 1:2015cv00797
Defendant:
CACH, LLC
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
