Cases 1 - 10 of 19
KLEIN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
as 1:2022cv01323
Plaintiff:
SUSAN M. KLEIN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
BADGER DAYLIGHTING CORP. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv01265
Plaintiff:
BADGER DAYLIGHTING CORP.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Excise Tax
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. John & John Associates, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00408
Defendant:
John & John Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
DADON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03862
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DADON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
TRIMBLE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00326
Plaintiff:
MARGARET L. TRIMBLE and PHILLIP N. TRIMBLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LOCKHART
as 1:2016cv01529
Defendant:
GREGORY L. LOCKHART
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HOOPS et al
as 2:2015cv00419
Defendant:
DJ AUTO SALES SERVICE LLC, DWH AUTOMOTIVE LLC and DAVID W. HOOPS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
BREWER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00306
Plaintiff:
GREG A. BREWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HIATT et al
as 1:2012cv01103
Defendant:
JACOB A. HIATT and MARZELLA K. HIATT
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE v. SPERRY
as 1:2012cv00320
Defendant:
PHILLIP F. SPERRY
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
