Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Jane Magnus-stinson
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,481
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by filed date
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AMMONS HARRIS et al v. GATES et al
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff: JEAN T. AMMONS HARRIS and CLTEAM ADMINISTRATOR
Defendant: BILL GATES, MICROSOFT and CONCEPT LUXURY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00197
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02469
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02338
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PSENCIK et al v. CORTEVA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02423
Plaintiff: Walter Psencik and Travis Psencik
Defendant: Corteva, Inc., SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?