Cases 11 - 20 of 62
WHITE v. BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF INDIANA, INC.
as 2:2015cv00268
Defendant:
BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF INDIANA, INC.
Plaintiff:
SHERRY L. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LAWSON v. HARRISON MANUFACTURING INC.
as 2:2015cv00130
Defendant:
HARRISON MANUFACTURING INC
Plaintiff:
SCOTT F. LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DRAKE v. HALTER VEGETATION MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2014cv00074
Plaintiff:
KEVIN T. DRAKE
Defendant:
HALTER VEGETATION MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BOGGAN v. LEMON
as 2:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BOGGAN
Defendant:
BILL LEMON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
WICKISER v. ALORICA, INC.
as 2:2012cv00369
Defendant:
ALORICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
SAMMIE C. WICKISER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KENWORTHY et al v. SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
as 2:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
MATHEW AKERS, AMANDA CHAPLIN, LATERICIA DEAL and others
Defendant:
SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WIYAKASKA v. ROSS GAGE, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01664
Defendant:
BRUCE MEYERS, THOMAS ROSS and ROSS GAGE, INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. WIYAKASKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SAMPSON v. BRIDGES OF INDIANA, INC.
as 2:2010cv00304
Defendant:
BRIDGES OF INDIANA, INC.
Plaintiff:
SANDRA L. SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McCARTY et al v. SOUTHERN PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00289
Defendant:
JAMES RICKY BAGWELL, BBWI INVESTMENTS, LLC, MASON HARRISON RATLIFF ENTERPRISES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TABATHA S. McCARTY and STEPHANIE J. WOFFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KIRSCH v. BSA LIFESTRUCTURES, INC.
as 1:2010cv01219
Defendant:
BSA LIFESTRUCTURES, INC.
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE KIRSCH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
