Cases 21 - 30 of 159
VARELLAS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2014cv00322
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J. VARELLAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
HUSPON v. GLOBAL TEL-LINK CORPORATION
as 1:2014cv01514
Defendant:
GLOBAL TEL-LINK CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUSPON
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
DEAN v. SYNCHRONY BANK F/K/A GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK
as 2:2014cv00279
Plaintiff:
SARAH DEAN
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and SYNCHRONY BANK
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
GREENE et al v. PASSAGES HOSPICE, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00992
Defendant:
CRAIG J. FRANK, MICHAEL GILLMAN, SETH GILLMAN and others
Plaintiff:
NANCY GREENE, KRISTA GRUBER, ANN MCKENZIE HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
KUHLMAN v. WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO, L.P.A.
as 1:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
CHRIS KUHLMAN
Defendant:
WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO, L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BADOLATO v. ACCOUNT CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
as 2:2014cv00060
Defendant:
ACCOUNT CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Plaintiff:
DONALD BADOLATO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
COTTINGHAM v. MED SHIELD, INC.
as 1:2013cv01021
Plaintiff:
SUSAN COTTINGHAM
Defendant:
MED SHIELD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PAULUS v. PRIDE ACQUISITIONS et al
as 1:2012cv01433
Defendant:
BAKER SANDERS, LLC and PRIDE ACQUISITIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
JULIE PAULUS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JOHNSON v. REDMAN LUDWIG, PC
as 1:2012cv01310
Plaintiff:
MISHA JOHNSON
Defendant:
REDMAN LUDWIG, PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NICOULIN v. KROLL, INC.
as 2:2012cv00244
Defendant:
KROLL, INC. and SAINT VINCENT WILLIAMSPORT HOSPITAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK A. NICOULIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
