Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Mark Dinsmore
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
RITCHIE v. IU HEALTH PHYSICIANS
as 1:2023cv01037
Plaintiff: BRANDI RITCHIE
Defendant: IU HEALTH PHYSICIANS, ANONYMOUS HOSPITAL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
PADGETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv01439
Plaintiff: ANNETTE PADGETT
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
BYRD v. RICHARD ROUDEBUSH VA MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2022cv00256
Plaintiff: BAYNE BYRD
Defendant: RICHARD ROUDEBUSH VA MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
BULLOCK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv01209
Plaintiff: MICHAEL E. BULLOCK
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
WHITE v. KIM
as 1:2019cv03068
Plaintiff: BRENDA L. WHITE
Defendant: PETER KIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
MYNHIER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv03650
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: KAREN MYNHIER and MARTY MYNHIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
POER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01622
Plaintiff: DARRELL V. POER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
WILLIAMS v. MAYDA
as 1:2018cv01467
Defendant: JARO MAYDA, II
Plaintiff: WILMA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WESOLOWSKI v. SUNDARAM, MD et al
as 1:2018cv00975
Defendant: BENJAMIN CARPENTER, JEROMY HACKNEY, CHANDRU SUNDARAM and others
Plaintiff: DENNIS WESOLOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
MOORE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00162
Plaintiff: JASON W. MOORE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?