Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Mark Dinsmore
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,206
HANAFI v. UETSA TSAKITS, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01765
Plaintiff: Mary Hanafi
Defendant: Uetsa Tsakits, Inc. doing business as MaxLend, David Johnson, Kirk Michael Chewning and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
REHFELDT v. WAHIDO LENDING et al
as 1:2023cv01756
Plaintiff: SARAH REHFELDT
Defendant: WAHIDO LENDING doing business as RIVER VALLEY LOANS, CREDITSERVE, INC., ERIC WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00464
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01672
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01637
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01572
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01571
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01522
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC. v. MOHAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01497
Plaintiff: ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC.
Defendant: VINOD MOHAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01488
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?