Cases 51 - 60 of 178
CHEN et al v. GENESCO, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00690
Defendant:
HAT WORLD INC., GENESCO, INC. and HAT WORLD INC. doing business as LIDS
Plaintiff:
DARIO SALAS and MELISSA CHEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KELLEY v. CAREGAN TRANSPORT, INC.
as 1:2018cv00500
Defendant:
CAREGAN TRANSPORT, INC.
Plaintiff:
NICO KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MEIVES v. WHELAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
BRANDI V. MEIVES
Defendant:
ROSINKO EXPRESS, LLC and WHELAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
SWEET v. TAKENAKA CORPORATION (USA)
as 1:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
DAVID SWEET
Defendant:
TAKENAKA CORPORATION (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
HENDERSON v. US INVESTOR GROUP, LLC
as 1:2017cv03535
Plaintiff:
CARIN HENDERSON
Defendant:
US INVESTOR GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
HINGST v. NALC et al
as 1:2017cv02133
Defendant:
GREGORY GOULD and NALC
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HINGST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
PORTER v. ANGIE'S LIST, INC.
as 1:2017cv01540
Defendant:
ANGIE'S LIST, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARTY PORTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
YARDLEY v. Q SERVICES LLC
as 1:2017cv01253
Defendant:
Q SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY YARDLEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PRICE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00706
Plaintiff:
Ogbonna Anih and CLINTON PRICE
Defendant:
RASIER, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
JAMES v. ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF INDIANAPOLIS, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00609
Defendant:
ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF INDIANAPOLIS, LLC and KERRY JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
ALESIA JAMES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
