Cases 1 - 10 of 442
HERZ v. ROTHBERG et al
as 1:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Defendant:
MARC ROTHBERG, EVAN GOODMAN, DAVID F. HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WHEAT et al v. MENARD INC.
as 1:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
GLEN WHEAT and LINDA WHEAT
Defendant:
MENARD INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PETRO v. MENARD, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
LEO PETRO
Defendant:
MENARD, INC. and MENARDS STORE #3180 AT COLUMBUS INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BELLER v. SAM'S EAST, INC. d/b/a SAM'S CLUB
as 1:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BELLER, JR
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC. d/b/a SAM'S CLUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CAMPBELL v. CASEY'S MARKETING COMPANY d/b/a CASEY'S
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CASEY'S MARKETING COMPANY d/b/a CASEY'S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
PEREZ v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
GLORIA PEREZ
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MINEVICH v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I
as 1:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
NATALY MINEVICH
Defendant:
KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CORNELIUS et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Marcia Cornelius and Kenneth Cornelius
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
LONNEMAN v. PEPSICO BEVERAGE SALES LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Mary Lonneman
Defendant:
PepsiCo Beverage Sales LLC and KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I
Cross Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DEAN v. HOOK-SUPERX, L.L.C.
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
JACKIE LINN DEAN
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX, L.L.C. d/b/a CVS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
