Cases 11 - 20 of 318
APEX BENEFITS GROUP, INC. v. DREYFUS
as 1:2018cv00152
Plaintiff:
APEX BENEFITS GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
ERIC DREYFUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BALLARD v. SOUTHWEST CREDIT SYSTEM, LP et al
as 1:2018cv00019
Defendant:
AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. and SOUTHWEST CREDIT SYSTEM, LP
Plaintiff:
MARTHA BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KHADER et al
as 1:2017cv04561
Defendant:
ZIAD I. KHADER, NEIL H. PATEL and NIKHIL H. PATEL
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Injunction against Fraud
PAVLACK v. ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2017cv02935
Plaintiff:
ERIC S. PAVLACK
Defendant:
ROYLA ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
TINSLEY v. COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2017cv02926
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
REBEKAH TINSLEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LAURENZO v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv02904
Plaintiff:
DAWN LAURENZO
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HAGER v. MORGAN & POTTINGER, P.S.C.
as 1:2017cv02888
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HAGER
Defendant:
MORGAN & POTTINGER, P.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HACKETT v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 1:2017cv02700
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
TAMIA HACKETT
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
PLUMMER v. NICOR ENERGY SERVICES COMPANY
as 1:2017cv02177
Defendant:
NICOR ENERGY SERVICES COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN PLUMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
CURRAN et al v. PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
ERIC CURRAN and SHELIA CURRAN
Defendant:
PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
