Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge William Lawrence
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,060
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03393
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03307
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03289
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03287
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03034
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03006
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
PAVLACK v. ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2017cv02935
Plaintiff: ERIC S. PAVLACK
Defendant: ROYLA ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
TINSLEY v. COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2017cv02926
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff: REBEKAH TINSLEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LAURENZO v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv02904
Plaintiff: DAWN LAURENZO
Defendant: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02895
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?