Cases 61 - 70 of 1,060
KENNEDY v. TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2018cv00497
Plaintiff:
ALISON KENNEDY
Defendant:
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LARDIZABAL v. ANDREWS AND COX, P.C et al
as 2:2018cv00072
Defendant:
AMERICAN ACCEPTANCE CO., LLC, and ANDREWS AND COX, P.C
Plaintiff:
JOSE LARDIZABAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00385
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ISRAEL v. RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC.
as 1:2018cv00336
Plaintiff:
TODD ISRAEL
Defendant:
RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. BLACK-SNODGRASS
as 1:2018cv00214
Respondent:
LA TOIJA BLACK-SNODGRASS
Petitioner:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE and FAYETTE COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00175
Defendant:
ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS, LLC, ALLERGAN PLC and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE and FAYETTE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00172
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
APEX BENEFITS GROUP, INC. v. DREYFUS
as 1:2018cv00152
Plaintiff:
APEX BENEFITS GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
ERIC DREYFUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
