Cases 1 - 10 of 82
LUKENS v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
JILLETTE K. LUKENS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WINNINGHAM v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv03103
Plaintiff:
CHASTITY L. WINNINGHAM
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
HELTERBRAND v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01318
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA G. HELTERBRAND
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
CHAPEL v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01862
Plaintiff:
TERESA KAY CHAPEL
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
MILLER v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00543
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ANN MILLER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MALLERNEE v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv00050
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. MALLERNEE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JACOBSON v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01594
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
MARGARET JACOBSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HOLLOWAY v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00232
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
KEISTON R. HOLLOWAY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MARSHALL v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01084
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MARSHALL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WHITE v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00804
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE D. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
