Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ABPLANALP v. MARGARITAVILLE VACATION CLUB BY WYNDHAM INC., et al.
as 1:2021cv02253
Plaintiff:
Karen Adplanalp and KAREN ABPLANALP
Defendant:
Margaritaville Vacation Club by Wyndham Inc., Wyndham Vacation Ownership Inc, MARGARITAVILLE VACATION CLUB BY WYNDHAM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
DEATON v. L&S FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
as 4:2020cv00199
Plaintiff:
Karen Deaton
Defendant:
L&S Family Entertainment, LLC and L & S FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMPSON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 2:2020cv00061
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
KAREN SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRIMES v. WALMART STORES EAST, LP
as 4:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
KAREN GRIMES
Defendant:
WALMART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETRIE v. MENARD, INC.
as 1:2019cv04850
Plaintiff:
KAREN PETRIE
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK-BATES v. HOOK-SUPERX, LLC
as 1:2019cv04283
Plaintiff:
Karen Cook-Bates
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX, LLC D/B/A CVS PHARMACY and HOOK-SUPERX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOLIVER v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
as 1:2019cv02651
Plaintiff:
KAREN TOLIVER
Defendant:
D/B/A DOLLAR TREE #4822 DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. and DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROUT v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03235
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WALMART, INC.
Plaintiff:
KAREN D. ROUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAYLESS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 2:2018cv00166
Plaintiff:
KAREN R. GRAYLESS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
WINGLER v. APRIA HEALTHCARE LLC, ET AL
as 1:2017cv00177
Defendant:
APRIA HEALTHCARE LLC and COLE AH INDIANAPOLIS IN, LLC
Plaintiff:
KAREN WINGLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
