Cases 41 - 50 of 56
BOYLES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00851
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. BOYLES and LEEANN BOYLES
Defendant:
ERIC SHINESKI and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
BEATTY et al v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
LUCINDA BEATTY, THE ESTATE OF MONTY RAE BEATTY and RALPH BEATTY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
SHAW v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv01315
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. SHAW
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
WEAVER et al v. OPEN DOOR/BHM HEALTH CENTER, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00407
Plaintiff:
JEREMY WEAVER, TONI GRADDY-WEAVER and L.G.W.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MCINTOSH v. WEBSTER et al
as 2:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
DR. THOMAS WEBSTER, DR. WILLIAM WILSON, DR. DAVID LUKEN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BRUCE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv00174
Plaintiff:
TAMEILIA BRUCE and ANTHONY BOSWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv00161
Plaintiff:
SANDRA JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ODIORNE et al v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ODIORNE and ELLA ODIORNE
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ESPARZA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00748
Plaintiff:
JAMES ESPARZA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
