Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BITCO GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION v. QC COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01676
Plaintiff:
BITCO GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
COMCAST OF INDIANAPOLIS LP, DUKE ENERGY INDIANA INC. and QC COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
HIGHLAND TH, LLC et al v. CITY OF TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2015cv00196
Defendant:
DUKE BENNETT, BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY, CITY OF TERRE HAUTE and others
Plaintiff:
HIGHLAND TH, LLC and OVERSEAS LEASE GROUP, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HIGHLAND TH, LLC et al v. CITY OF TERRE HAUTE et al
as 1:2015cv00905
Defendant:
DUKE BENNETT, BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY, CITY OF TERRE HAUTE and others
Plaintiff:
HIGHLAND TH, LLC and OVERSEAS LEASE GROUP, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC. v. COMCAST OF INDIANAPOLIS, LLC
as 1:2014cv02041
Defendant:
COMCAST OF INDIANAPOLIS, LLC
Plaintiff:
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
BENTON COUNTY WIND FARM LLC v. DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC.
as 1:2013cv01984
Plaintiff:
BENTON COUNTY WIND FARM LLC
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DUKE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv01630
Plaintiff:
MARY DUKE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
AMERICAN SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY v. I.E. TRANSPORTATION et al
as 3:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
I.E. TRANSPORTATION, WESTERN KENTUCKY TRANS., INC., OWENSBORO YELLOW CAB CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
H.C. DUKE & SON, INC. v. BIEN, INC.
as 1:2008cv00400
Plaintiff:
H.C. DUKE & SON, INC.
Defendant:
BIEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
