Cases 11 - 20 of 31
ANGIE'S LIST, INC. v. AMAZONLOCAL LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00968
Plaintiff:
ANGIE'S LIST, INC.
Defendant:
AMAZONLOCAL LLC, MICHAEL ALBO, KRISTIN BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS . . .
as 1:2015mc00049
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
MICHELE RENE IGNEY, GARY LEE ROYER, HOLLY DEMAREST WARSHAUER and others
BAKER v. ROSENTHAL, MORGAN AND THOMAS, INC.
as 1:2015cv00548
Plaintiff:
BESHONDIA BAKER
Defendant:
ROSENTHAL, MORGAN AND THOMAS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01785
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WALLS v. KRUSE et al
as 3:2013mc00010
Respondent:
REA BAKER and BRETT KRUSE
Petitioner:
ANTHONY C. WALLS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BAKER v. NATIONS RECOVERY CENTER, INC., et al
as 1:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BAKER
Defendant:
JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC and NATIONS RECOVERY CENTER, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PAULUS v. PRIDE ACQUISITIONS et al
as 1:2012cv01433
Defendant:
BAKER SANDERS, LLC and PRIDE ACQUISITIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
JULIE PAULUS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
