Cases 21 - 30 of 35
ATWELL v. IMC CREDIT SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2013cv00294
Plaintiff:
HEATHER ATWELL
Defendant:
IMC CREDIT SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
EUTSEY v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 1:2012mc00079
Defendant:
JAMES BASSINGER, JOSEPH BAUMBERGER, HEATHER BLASINGAME and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN EUTSEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00777
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00531
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MCFARLAND v. ACCOUNTS RECOVERY BUREAU, INC.
as 1:2010cv00891
Defendant:
ACCOUNTS RECOVERY BUREAU, INC.
Plaintiff:
HEATHER MCFARLAND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
