Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JONES v. BERRY, III
as 1:2013cv00295
Defendant:
GIL I. BERRY, III
Plaintiff:
SCOTT JONES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HERFF JONES, INC. v. RADFORD
as 1:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
HERFF JONES, INC.
Defendant:
KYLE RADFORD
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
JONES et al v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01274
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHATTERTON and NICOLE JONES
Defendant:
WILLIAM COLOMBO, JAY CROSSON, DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
JONES v. ACCOUNT RECOVERY BUREAU, INC.
as 1:2010cv01212
Defendant:
ACCOUNT RECOVERY BUREAU, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JONES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ECKERT v. CENTRAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00311
Defendant:
CENTRAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. and MARGARET MARY JONES
Plaintiff:
BRENDA S. ECKERT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
IN RE: BANIK et al
as 1:2009mc00054
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. KIAS, HEATHER L. CLARK-REYNOLDS, RICKY D. DOYLE and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS IN LAWYER DISCIPLINARY CASES OF:
JELENEK-JONES v. ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
TAMMY JELENEK-JONES
Defendant:
ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
