Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CARR v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00233
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC and LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
Plaintiff:
CONNIE CARR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2018mc00038
Respondent:
ANDREW JOHN ALBRIGHT, MICHAEL EUGENE ALLEN, MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GORDON v. CAVALRY SPV I, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00237
Defendant:
CAVALRY SPV I, LLC and LLOYD & MCDANIEL PLC
Plaintiff:
KRISTIE GORDON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WARREN v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
as 1:2016cv03151
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WARREN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
