Cases 11 - 20 of 120
TURNER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2020cv00648
Plaintiff:
LORI TURNER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
A.S. et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2019cv04798
Plaintiff:
A. S. and FAITH LINDQUIST
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALFAYYAD v. WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST et al
as 1:2019cv04530
Plaintiff:
DENA ALFAYYAD
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SORLIE v. SAM'S EAST, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01419
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN SORLIE
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC. and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PORTER v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2018cv03518
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
MARY PORTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GRISHIN et al v. WARES DELAWARE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv02961
Defendant:
WARES DELAWARE CORPORATION, SAM'S EAST, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STAS GRISHIN, RAISHA GRISHIN and RAISA GRISHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BYRD et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01460
Plaintiff:
J. A. and LATOSHA BYRD
Defendant:
JANICE DOE, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MENSAH et al v. WAL-MART STORES INC.
as 1:2018cv00403
Plaintiff:
ALFRED MENSAH and MARGARET MENSAH
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HOLT v. WAL-MART STORES INC.
as 1:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
JUDY A HOLT
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ORR v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2017cv04703
Plaintiff:
DEBRA ORR
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
