Cases 31 - 40 of 114
DOE v. COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 1:2020cv02402
Defendant:
COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOE v. MEDICAL CITY DALLAS
as 1:2020cv02404
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MEDICAL CITY DALLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER v. CR BARD INC et al
as 3:2020cv00211
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, CR BARD INC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEIM v. C R BARD INC et al
as 1:2020cv02293
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY KEIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSE v. C R BARD INC et al
as 3:2020cv00192
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC, BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
HAMBY ROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GULIUS v. JEFF TAYLOR PERFORMANCE ENGINES, INC. et al
as 4:2020cv00149
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Jeff Taylor Performance Engines, Inc., JEFF TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
John Gulius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. NAVISTAR, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv01493
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
MAJOR JOHN DOE and NAVISTAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SNABEL v. GREAT STATES CORPORATION et al
as 1:2020cv01411
Defendant:
ZHEJIANG YAT ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE COMPANY, LTD., JOHN & JANE DOES, GREAT STATES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP J SNABEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00156
Defendant:
JAMES COOMER, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC., PURDUE PHARMA L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00155
Defendant:
ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC., PURDUE PHARMA L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA and CITY OF AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
