Cases 1 - 10 of 20
JACKSON et al v. AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01823
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC, INC. and AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES JACKSON and LAURI ANN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TANKERSLEY v. MEDTRONIC, INC.
as 1:2017cv04545
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC, INC.
Plaintiff:
STEVEN TANKERSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
GRIFFIN et al v. MEDTRONIC INC. et al
as 1:2017cv03292
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. GRIFFIN, SR and REGINALD JACKSON, JR
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC INC. and MEDTRONIC MINIMED, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAILEY et al v. MEDTRONIC, INC.
as 1:2017cv02314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BAILEY and SHANNON BAILEY
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
JANES v. MEDTRONIC, INC.
as 1:2016cv00639
Plaintiff:
RONALD JANES
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. MEDTRONIC, INC.
as 2:2014cv00051
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC, INC.
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
BELL et al v. MEDTRONIC INC.
as 1:2012cv01727
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. BELL and PAMELA CHENIN BELL
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WRIGHT et al v. MEDTRONIC INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01137
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC INC. and MEDTRONIC USA INC
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY WRIGHT and JOHN WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. MEDTRONIC INC.
as 1:2011cv01036
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC INC.
Plaintiff:
NATALIE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STANKOVICH et al v. MEDTRONIC, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00907
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC MINIMED, INC. and MEDTRONIC, INC.
Plaintiff:
KAREN STANKOVICH and PAUL STANKOVICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
