Cases 1 - 7 of 7
PITTMAN JONES v. AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Deborah Pittman Jones
Defendant:
AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES, LLC, EagleCare, LLC d/b/a American Senior Communities and EAGLE CARE, LLC. DBA AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FITCH v. GIANT EAGLE, INC.
as 1:2018cv01236
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FITCH
Defendant:
GIANT EAGLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. EAGLE FLOORING CO., INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01837
Defendant:
MARY E. DAVISSON-VEIT and EAGLE FLOORING CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION TRUST FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
PARKS et al v. EAGLE VENTILATION LLC
as 1:2012cv01803
Defendant:
EAGLE VENTILATION LLC
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PARKS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 20 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION FUND, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 20 INDIANAPOLIS AREA PENSION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
BARTON et al v. EAGLE HAULING & CONVEYING, INC.
as 1:2011cv01142
Plaintiff:
DANNY BARTON and INDIANA TEAMSTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND
Defendant:
EAGLE HAULING & CONVEYING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
BOWMER v. EAGLE NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE CO.
as 1:2010cv01148
Plaintiff:
MELISSA J. BOWMER
Defendant:
EAGLE NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
BARTON et al v. C.S. EAGLE HAULING, INC.
as 1:2008cv00199
Plaintiff:
DANNY BARTON and INDIANA TEAMSTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND
Defendant:
C.S. EAGLE HAULING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
