Cases 1 - 6 of 6
RICHARDSON v. CITY OF MARTINSVILLE et al
as 1:2023cv01701
Plaintiff:
NATHAN RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CITY OF MARTINSVILLE and JOHN RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
RICHARDSON v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Laurel Richardson
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company,, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. COMMERCIAL DOORS INSTALL AND SERVICE INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv03451
Defendant:
COMMERCIAL DOORS INSTALL AND SERVICE INCORPORATED and TRICIA L. RICHARDSON
Plaintiff:
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
LAUER et al v. JR STRUTS SUPPORT, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01107
Plaintiff:
JOE COAR, INDIANA/KENTUCKY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, MIKE LAUER and others
Defendant:
JR STRUTS SUPPORT, INC. and JAMES E. RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LAUER et al v. RICHARDSON CONTRACTORS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00281
Plaintiff:
JOE COAR, INDIANA/KENTUCKY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, MIKE LAUER and others
Defendant:
JEFF RICHARDSON and RICHARDSON CONTRACTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BENEFIEL et al v. THE GUIDE CORPORATION HOURLY-RATE EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN et al
as 1:2009cv00392
Plaintiff:
DAVID BENEFIEL, MICHAEL R. CARSON, RICHARD W. CORWIN and others
Defendant:
THE GUIDE CORPORATION HOURLY-RATE EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, GUIDE CORPORATION, THE GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION HOURLY-RATE EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
