Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 98
MULLINS v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2021cv00137
Plaintiff: FARMER MULLINS
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
VAUGHN v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2021cv00109
Plaintiff: RONALD K VAUGHN
Defendant: Andrew M Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
HATCHER v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01880
Plaintiff: HEATHER HATCHER
Defendant: Andrew M Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SHEETS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv01834
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Plaintiff: Melissa Sheets
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COOPER v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01791
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: SHELLIE J. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FAIRER v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv01399
Plaintiff: KENNETH FAIRER
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs
SMITH v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00224
Plaintiff: BARBARA J. SMITH
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs
HERRON v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv01270
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SCOTT HERRON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BOOHER v. SAUL
as 2:2021cv00211
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: JILL LYNN BOOHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FISHER v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01104
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: JOHN MATTHEW FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?