Cases 1 - 10 of 321
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE et al v. ROSEMA CORPORATION, AN INDIANA DOMESTIC FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE, BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT PLAN, BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS, INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND, BAC 4 IN/KY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING PROGRAM, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 4 OF INDIANA & KENTUCKY, and others
Defendant:
ROSEMA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE et al v. LEIDAL & HART MASON CONTRACTORS, INC
as 1:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE, BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT PLAN, BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND BRICKLAYERS, ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND, BAC 4 IN/KY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING PROGRAM and others
Defendant:
LEIDAL & HART MASON CONTRACTORS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
KNOWLES, et al v. SILLIMAN CONTRACTING GROUP, LLC
as 1:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE, BRICKLAYERS OFINDIANA RETIREMENT PLAN, BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, BRICKLAYERS & ALLIEDCRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND, BAC 4 IN/KY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING PROGRAM, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS and others
Defendant:
SILLIMAN CONTRACTING GROUP, LLC. a Kentucky for-profit corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
KNOWLES, et al. v SLATILE ROOFING & SHEET METAL, INC.
as 1:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE, BRICKLAYERS OFINDIANA RETIREMENT PLAN, BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND, BAC 4 IN/KY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING PROGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 357 et al v. REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 357 and ELIJAH BURGESS
Defendant:
REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE OF THE BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT FUND et al v. HOFMANN, INC.
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE OF THE BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT FUND, BRICKLAYERS AND TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND (AS SUCCESSOR TO BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND) and others
Defendant:
HOFMANN, INC.an Indiana domestic for-profit corporation, and HOFMANN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
KNOWLES, et al. v. LANDRY MASONRY COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND and others
Defendant:
LANDRY MASONRY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
KNOWLES v. BARTLEY & PERIGO MASONRY CONTRACTORS, INC
as 1:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT PLAN, BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND and others
Defendant:
BARTLEY & PERIGO MASONRY CONTRACTORS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
KNOWLES et al v. MIDWEST CAULKING, INC.
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Stephen Knowles, Trustee and Bricklayers of Indiana Health and Welfare Fund and Pension Fund and International Pension Funds, STEPHEN KNOWLES, BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT PLAN and others
Defendant:
Midwest Caulking, Inc., an Indiana corporation and MIDWEST CAULKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE et al v. 5 STAR MASONRY, LLC
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE, BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT PLAN, BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND and others
Defendant:
5 STAR MASONRY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
