Cases 121 - 130 of 1,710
Barnett et al v. Scott County Fiscal Court et al
as 5:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Evan Barnett
Defendant:
Scott County Fiscal Court, Sharon Muse, Georgetown Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 0:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael Adrian Howard
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Applegate et al v. Robey
as 0:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Roy Applegate
Defendant:
Amy Robey and Heather McManis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Parker
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Branden M. Scott
Defendant:
Ashley Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson v. Jackson et al
as 6:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Adam Jackson
Defendant:
Malachi Jackson and Grant Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nielsen v. FMC Lexington Warden
as 5:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Ephraim J. Nielsen
Defendant:
FMC Lexington Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Amerson v. USP Pollock
as 6:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Steven Amerson
Defendant:
USP Pollock, Warden, USP McCreary and SHU Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sumner et al
as 6:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Smith
Defendant:
Stephanie Sumner, Ms. Lawson and Carrie Cunnagin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Mark Norris
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Dominique Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
