Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Robinson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Maurice Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Haga v. Robinson, et al
as 5:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Donna Haga
Counter Claimant:
Randall Robinson and Carolyn Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Robinson v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Paula Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robinson v. Dollar General Corporation
as 3:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jerry Robinson
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Robinson v. Eastern Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robinson
Defendant:
Eastern Express, Inc. and Gary Ishaim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Couch v. Clay County, Ky et al
as 6:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Patrick Robinson, Bill Warran, Jerrod Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County Sheriff Office et al
as 6:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Clay County Sheriff Office, Patrick Robinson, Jerrod Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Robinson et al
as 6:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
John Stevens
Defendant:
Patrick Robinson, Trent Baker, Oscar Gayle House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
