Cases 31 - 40 of 474
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Applied Concepts, Inc. v. MPH Industries, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Applied Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
MPH Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
7D Holdings, LLC v. Jawk Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
7D Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Jawk Holdings LLC and GenRev Labs LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
7D Holdings, LLC v. Jawk Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
7D Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Jawk Holdings LLC and GenRev Labs LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Tapestry, Inc. et al v. Rigdon et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Tapestry, Inc., Coach Services, Inc. and Kate Spade, LLC
Defendant:
Jo Ann Sanders Rigdon, Sheri E. Sanders Smith, The Pink Daisy Market, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Boomer v. Sellers
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boomer
Defendant:
Tanner Larry Sellers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Illuminated Designs, Inc. v. CSG Property Investors, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00124
Defendant:
CSG Property Investors, LLC, Sammy, The Pettit Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Illuminated Designs, Inc. doing business as Modernwash
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
