Cases 171 - 180 of 5,355
Williams v. Martin
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Gary Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Brown
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Anna Valentine, Wellpath Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Stephen M. Patterson, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ray v. Kentucky Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vick v. Butts
as 4:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Clifford Vick
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Butts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hart v. Louisville Metro Corrections Classifacation et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Josie Samantha Hart
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections Classifacation and David Pukett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mintchie
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Mintchie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Garcia
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallory et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Mallory, Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhhammad and Mrs. Porshia Moneice Mallory
Defendant:
Phillip Smith, John Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Harmon et al
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Marlon R. Jackson
Defendant:
Steve Harmon and Capt. Lindsey Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
