Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Crawford et al v. Bevin et al
as 3:2017cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jamal R. Crawford and Walter D. King
Defendant:
Matt Bevin, Greg Fischer and Mark Bolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Tangilag et al
as 5:2015cv00185
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lane King
Defendant:
Shastine Tangilag, Karen Vickery, Jennifer Whalen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pulliam v. Truman et al
as 3:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
Elton Calvin Pulliam, Jr.
Defendant:
Karl Truman and James King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye v. King et al
as 5:2013cv00224
Plaintiff:
Devon A. Frye
Defendant:
Daniel King and Tiffany Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Thompson et al
as 3:2013cv00322
Plaintiff:
Susan King
Defendant:
LaDonna H. Thompson, Kentucky Parole Board and Kentucky Division of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Thompson et al
as 3:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
Shawn Wright
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Clark Taylor, Daniel King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brittain v. Clemons et al
as 4:2009cv00123
Defendant:
Rick Clemons, Darwin Dennison, Jay Woosely and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Darnell Brittain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton et al v. Lancia et al
as 3:2009cv00294
Plaintiff:
Charles Clayton, Michael G. Campbell, Shawn Michael Hartford and others
Defendant:
Christine A. Lancia, Randall S. Pitcher and Donald M. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. The Indianapolis Star et al
as 3:2009cv00278
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
The Indianapolis Star, Gannett Newspaper, Michael G. Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minnifield v. Chandler et al
as 3:2007cv00207
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Minnifield
Defendant:
Larry Chandler, Jason Heimann, David Dykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
