Cases 21 - 30 of 122
Smith v. Mazza et al
as 4:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Defendant:
Kevin Mazza, Hope, Massden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sisk v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2021cv00509
Plaintiff:
Leonard D. Sisk
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center and Unknown Names of Deputies Involved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Garland et al
as 3:2021cv00460
Plaintiff:
Robert Dean Mitchell
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Carvajal, DSCC Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kliessendorff et al v. Nelson County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Kliessendorff, M.A.K., A.R.K. and others
Defendant:
Nelson County Jail, Nelson County Sherriff's, Nelson County Taskforce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornwell v. Unknown Officers at Kentucky State Reformatory
as 3:2021cv00270
Plaintiff:
Adam Cornwell
Defendant:
Unknown Officers at Kentucky State Reformatory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Crews et al
as 5:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Defendant:
Ricktor, William Simpson, Chase McRoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Unknown Michigan State Trooper et al
as 3:2020cv00861
Defendant:
J. Russell, Caleb Brill, Betty R. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Durrell Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Daviess County Detention Center
as 4:2020cv00206
Petitioner:
James Lee Mays
Respondent:
Unknown and Daviess County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chapman v. O'Dell
as 5:2020cv00165
Plaintiff:
Marcus Chapman and Marcus Fitzgang Chapman
Defendant:
Sgt. O'Dell, Sgt. Butler Cortez, Deputy Warden Syler Grief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Central Office Classification Committee et al
as 5:2020cv00164
Defendant:
Unknown Members of COCC, Central Office Classification Committee, Alan D. Long and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery L. Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
