Cases 61 - 70 of 327
Mayo v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00424
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Mayo
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Daniel Long, Wellpath Corporate Headquarters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Gore et al
as 5:2021cv00050
Defendant:
Marc Manley, Bruce Von Dwingelo, Tom Gore and others
Plaintiff:
Leonel Miranda Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huffman v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv00217
Defendant:
Warden Scott Jordan, Katherine Williams, Courtney Forgy and others
Plaintiff:
James Robert Huffman, IV and James Richard Huffman, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campfield v. Nunley et al
as 4:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Kimberly Vick, Terry Nunley, William Dortch and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Campfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eakes v. County of Fulton et al
as 5:2021cv00038
Defendant:
Stantham Williams, County of Fulton, James Martin and others
Plaintiff:
James Eakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Crews et al
as 5:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Defendant:
Ricktor, William Simpson, Chase McRoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durance v. Schike et al
as 4:2021cv00019
Defendant:
William Lowery and Sgt. Preston Schike
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Durance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eakes v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Judge Executive for Fulton County, County of Fulton, James Martin and others
Plaintiff:
James Eakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Louisville Metro Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jewell Carr
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police Department, Joy L. William, Benjamin Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nation v. Roberts et al
as 5:2020cv00201
Defendant:
Amy Fisher, William Simpson, Michael Massey and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Nation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
