Cases 61 - 70 of 162
Cox v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00452
Plaintiff:
Jason Alexander Cox
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Dwayne Clark, Martin Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Leis v. Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearm Agency et al
as 1:2021cv00054
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, Officer Casey Stanton, Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearm Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Leis, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Clark et al
as 3:2021cv00103
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Correction Medical Department, Sgt Elmore, Martin Baker and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Detainees - Inmates and Shawn E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marsh v. Clark et al
as 3:2021cv00102
Plaintiff:
Chauncey M. Marsh
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark, Evan Michael Miesler, Juan Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00856
Defendant:
Dwayn Clark and Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Rhodes v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv00836
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Dr. A. Smith, Dwayne Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Brice Jamar Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddins v. Clark
as 3:2020cv00779
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eddins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pointer v. Clark et al
as 3:2020cv00739
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark and Martin Baker
Plaintiff:
Alex D. Pointer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross v. Clark et al
as 3:2020cv00725
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Cross
Defendant:
Martin Baker and Dewayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Baker et al
as 3:2020cv00647
Defendant:
Director Dewayne Clark and Deputy Director Martin Baker
Plaintiff:
Dewight M. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
