Cases 71 - 80 of 357
Harris et al v. USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner et al
as 3:2020cv00321
Plaintiff:
Julius Lee Thomas, Charlie Harris, RonDell Harris and others
Defendant:
Employees/Staff Officers, Etc., USP Big Sandy Food Services Admin, USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. City of Glasgow et al
as 1:2020cv00069
Defendant:
City of Glasgow, Barren County Sheriff, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petry-Blanchard v. Louis et al
as 4:2020cv00049
Respondent:
Other County Officials Unnamed, Susan Blanchard, Other State Officials Unnamed and others
Interested Party:
John Anthony Gentry
Petitioner:
Neely Petry-Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harrison v. Nelms et al
as 5:2020cv00058
Plaintiff:
Darius Harrison
Defendant:
John Hayden and Brooke Nelms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landon v. McCarty
as 4:2020cv00046
Respondent:
Judge John McCarty
Petitioner:
Elijah M. Landon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cisco v. McCarty
as 4:2020cv00037
Plaintiff:
William Clerence Cisco and William C. Cisco
Defendant:
John M. McCarty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Jackson v. Proctor et al
as 3:2020cv00115
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, John Proctor and Melissa Pohlman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johns v. Burns M Brady Center et al
as 3:2020cv00110
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Johns
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Burns M Brady Center, Heather Swinnie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Johns v. Burns M Brady Center et al
as 3:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Johns
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Burns M Brady Center and Heather Swinnie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Profitt v. LMDC Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Tommy Lee, LMDC Jail, Jim Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jason Profitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
