Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
McFarland v. Chandler
as 1:2008cv00012
Petitioner: Uzell McFarland
Respondent: Larry Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Chandler
as 3:2007cv00632
Plaintiff: Johnny Ray Moore
Defendant: Larry Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forester v. Chandler
as 3:2008cv00027
Petitioner: Clarence Grant Forester
Respondent: Larry Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Chandler
as 5:2007cv00177
Petitioner: Walter Gray Matthews, Jr.
Respondent: Larry Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stout v. Reese et al
as 3:2007cv00457
Defendant: John Reese, Larry Chandler, Paige McGuire and others
Plaintiff: Bobby Lee Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Pence et al
as 3:2007cv00332
Plaintiff: Alberto Santiago
Defendant: Steve Pence, John Rees, Charles Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. ABC Mortgage Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00094
Plaintiff: Michael A. Thompson
Defendant: ABC Mortgage Company, Inc., ABC Mortgage Company of Northwest Florida, Inc., Fremont Investment & Loan Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Minnifield v. Chandler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00207
Plaintiff: Roger Lee Minnifield
Defendant: Larry Chandler, Jason Heimann, David Dykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collier v. Chandler
as 3:2007cv00182
Petitioner: Charles Collier
Respondent: Larry Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?