Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Hughes et al v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00746
Plaintiff:
Marion E. Hughes , Raymond S. Batts , James A. Crume and others
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mafcote Industries, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00752
Plaintiff:
Mafcote Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Rubio v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00700
Plaintiff:
Lisa Rubio
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Caudill v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00547
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Caudill
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dewees v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00397
Plaintiff:
Nelson R. Dewees and Nelson R. Dewees
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., United Parcel Service of America, Inc., The Flexible Benefits Plan, Plan Number 501 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
