Cases 11 - 20 of 41
In Re: Terral RiverService Inc
as 2:2018cv05711
Petitioner:
Terral Riverservice, Inc.
Claimant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30504
Scott v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2017cv04815
Plaintiff:
Adam C. Scott
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2017cv03980
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Smith
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Mayes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2016cv16149
Plaintiff:
Rosie Mayes
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Henry v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Company, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02608
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. , James J. Flanagan Shipping Corporation , Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Dixie Machine Welding & Metal Works, Inc.
Third_party_defendant:
Claims Resolution Management Corporation
Plaintiff:
Amos Henry , Sharon Henry , Dymous Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Johnson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2015cv03558
Plaintiff:
Terrell Johnson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Johnson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2015cv03556
Plaintiff:
Terrell Johnson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Collins v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2014cv02192
Plaintiff:
Kenrick T. Collins
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Sims v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2014cv00035
Plaintiff:
Robert Sims
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Davis v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2013cv06092
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
