Cases 101 - 110 of 288
Thomas v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00673
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Jason Collins, Stephanie Lamartiniere and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00664
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Davidson Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00613
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Anthony White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2013cv00586
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Unknown Collins, Jimmy Cruze and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giovanni v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00566
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Jason Collins, Stephanie Lamartiniere and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Giovanni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fritz v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00556
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Jason Collins, Stephanie Lamartiniere and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Fritz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarre v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2013cv00555
Defendant:
Mark Briggs, N. Burl Cain, D. Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Navarre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00554
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Andrea Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00497
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Jamaal R. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lesley et al v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00490
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Jason Collins and Kenneth Norris
Plaintiff:
Kenneth F. Lesley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
