Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dargin v. Wilkinson et al
as 3:2009cv00325
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dargin
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson, Virgil Lucas, Nicole Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Wilkinson
as 3:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Bates
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wilkinson et al
as 3:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jackson
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson, Vigil Lucas, Larry Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mercadel v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2009cv00018
Plaintiff:
Troy Mercadel
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Winn Correctional Center, Tim Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Simpson v. Wilkinson et al
as 3:2008cv00259
Plaintiff:
David Paul Simpson
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson, Bruce Tripplet and Zachary Calahan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Wilkinson et al
as 3:2008cv00231
Petitioner:
Tori L. Jones
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson and James D. Caldwell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cochran v. Wilkinson et al
as 3:2007cv00619
Petitioner:
Joe D Cochran
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson and Attorney General for the State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCall v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2007cv00193
Plaintiff:
Frank L. McCall, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Richard L. Stalder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Wilkinson
as 3:2007cv00117
Petitioner:
Christopher David
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson and Charles C. Foti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Wilkinson et al
as 3:2007cv00011
Petitioner:
Oris Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson and Charles C. Foti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
