Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Tran v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2022cv00891
Plaintiff:
Tran M Tran and Tam Minh Tran
Defendant:
Franklin Parish Detention Center, Kelvin Cobb and Chad Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. McCain
as 2:2019cv01042
Defendant:
W S McCain
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Looney v. Vannoy
as 3:2019cv00939
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Plaintiff:
Leo Franklin Looney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Xavier v. Caraval
as 1:2015cv02132
Plaintiff:
Franklin Xavier
Defendant:
Michael D Caraval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Looney v. Cain
as 3:2015cv01844
Plaintiff:
Leo Franklin Looney
Defendant:
N Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Redfearn v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 3:2014cv00462
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Redfearn
Defendant:
Warden David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elmore v. Franklin Parish Detention Center
as 3:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
Darry Ray Elmore
Defendant:
Warden Franklin Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cunningham v. Franklin Parish Detention Center
as 5:2013cv00407
Plaintiff:
Henry Earl Cunningham
Defendant:
Warden Franklin Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bourque v. Franklin Parish Detention Center
as 6:2013cv00379
Plaintiff:
Brendall Bourque
Defendant:
Warden Franklin Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doucet v. Franklin Parish Detention Center
as 3:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
John B Doucet
Defendant:
Warden Franklin Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
