Cases 31 - 40 of 279
Carter v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv05212
Plaintiff:
Tyron Carter
Defendant:
Ricky Jones, Town of Saint Joseph, Tensas Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawsey v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv05217
Plaintiff:
James Hawsey
Defendant:
Ricky Jones, Town of Saint Joseph, Tensas Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lofton v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv05221
Plaintiff:
Rafael Lofton and Rafeal Lofton
Defendant:
Ricky Jones, Town of Saint Joseph, Tensas Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv05138
Plaintiff:
Chadrick McGhee
Defendant:
A Jones, Zackry Guice and Simmesport Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Jones et al
as 5:2022cv01497
Plaintiff:
Kolby R Moore
Defendant:
Steaven Jones and Ricky Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Matthew Joseph Jones
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Defendants and Pollock Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boswell v. Jones
as 5:2022cv01351
Plaintiff:
David Ray Boswell
Defendant:
Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilcrease v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
John Edward Gilcrease, Sr
Defendant:
Ricky Jones, Pat W Smith, Nolen Bass, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jones
Defendant:
William P Johnson, Charles L Barth, Adam S Rowley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jones
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, USA, William P Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
